9/6/2023 0 Comments Best rank supreme vourt jydge![]() Since Savage’s reporting, it appears that Thomas stopped disclosing these gifts. Savage in 2004 reported that the justice previously accepted expensive gifts and private plane trips from Crow and that Thomas was once Crow’s guest at Northern California’s Bohemian Grove, which hosts retreats for powerful men. ![]() This isn’t the first time Thomas failed to disclose gifts. “These trips appeared nowhere on Thomas’ financial disclosures,” the journalism nonprofit reported, adding that the failure to report flights seemed to violate federal law passed in the wake of the Watergate scandal. He and his wife, Ginni, globetrotted on private jets and super-yachts, all at Crow’s expense. Supreme Court justices are not exempt from this rule, but it includes an exception for the “personal hospitality of any individual,” so long as that hospitality does not involve official business.Ĭonservative Justice Clarence Thomas, however, has not disclosed lavish gifts and trips paid for by Dallas Republican donor Harlan Crow, ProPublica reported last month. As was his wont, Scalia delivered a scathing dissent saying the majority decision was a "threat to American democracy.You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.įederal judges are required to report expenses paid for by outside groups. Hodges: In 2015, the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage in the whole country with this case. That is perhaps debatable, but what is not debatable is that it is not the role of this Court to pronounce the Second Amendment extinct." Undoubtedly some think that the Second Amendment is outmoded in a society where our standing army is the pride of our Nation, where well-trained police forces provide personal security, and where gun violence is a serious problem. These include the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home. But the enshrinement of constitutional rights necessarily takes certain policy choices off the table. The Constitution leaves the District of Columbia a variety of tools for combating that problem, including some measures regulating handguns. "We are aware of the problem of handgun violence in this country, and we take seriously the concerns raised by the many amici who believe that prohibition of handgun ownership is a solution. "If civil rights are to be curtailed during wartime, it must be done openly and democratically, as the Constitution requires, rather than by silent erosion through an opinion of this Court," Scalia wrote. In his dissent, Scalia wrote that Congress could suspend some civil rights, but it had not done so when it passed an Authorization for Use of Military Force, as the plurality argued. citizen indefinitely without pressing charges or bringing them to trial. Rumsfeld: Interestingly, in an earlier case, Scalia wrote against the Bush administration, saying the U.S. But it is this Court's blatant abandonment of such a principle that produces the decision today." That consequence would be tolerable if necessary to preserve a time-honored legal principle vital to our constitutional Republic. ![]() It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed. ![]() "The game of bait-and-switch that today's opinion plays upon the Nation's Commander in Chief will make the war harder on us.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |